The unrecognized Bix Beiderbecke #2 - Alabammy Snow video free download


22,300
Duration: 02:47
Uploaded: 2009/08/24

On 15 May 1929 a small contingent of the Paul Whiteman Orchestra recorded two sides for Columbia - "What A Day" and "Alabammy Snow".

The record was issued under the pseudonym "The Mason-Dixon Orchestra" no doubt as an "in-joke" because the catalogue number of the record was 1861.

Okeh (a subsidiary label of Columbia) always issued recordings with a similar personnel under saxophonist Frank Trumbauer's name.

It is rumoured that "Tram" once mentioned that cornetist Bix Beiderbecke did not record with his orchestra for Okeh after the session of two weeks earlier, 30 April 1929.

But with a slightly different personnel under another name and for another label, this one-off session may have escaped Tram's memory and Bix recorded in the same studio on the day after this session.

The discographies have always named three trumpeters/cornetists for this date, Charlie Margulis, Harry Goldfield and Andy Secrest, all three Whiteman regulars and the latter known for his ability to sound like Bix, who was being featured less and less and was to leave the band permanently in September.

But at the time of the Mason-Dixon recording date, Bix was still very much with Whiteman and it would have been logical if he was present; he had done a radio show with the band the day before and recorded in the same Columbia studio with them the day after.

Still, in the discographies and books about Bix, it has always been accepted that he was not present and that everything on this record that sounds like Bix was actually played by Secrest.

However, careful listening and deducting reveals that Bix can be heard on both sides.

Using the latest techniques we have newly restored both titles from a mint copy of Columbia 1861-D and identification of Bix has become quite obvious.

First of all, on both sides Secrest is the very prominent lead cornetist and it is clear that there is only one other cornet present - Bix.

On "Alabammy Snow" there are two horns in the written ensembles (with Secrest again prominent) while the other, Bix, is filling in here and there - most significantly two descending phrases in the background from ca. 0:28 and another line, typical for him, in the final chorus at 2:29.

Neither of these phrases can be by Secrest who is heard simultaneously, nor do they sound anything like Margulis or Goldfield and we are confident that they are by Bix.

Note: all Bix Beiderbecke biographies that mention the session as well as "Jazz Records" name this title incorrectly as "Alabamy Snow".

Comments

10 years ago

songanddanceman100

Whoever it is, I like this side!

10 years ago

harryoakley

John had already passed away before I did my research and analyzing. We never discussed this record.

10 years ago

harryoakley

Secondly, I explained that Tram was correct, Bix did indeed not play on any Okeh session after April 30th. But I think Bix made the decision AFTER these Whiteman sessions and after China Boy and Oh Miss Hannah on which he sounded great. Also why would he not be on this Columbia session when he was on the other two a week earlier and the fourth on the day AFTER this one? But, more importantly, I believe that it's Bix because my ears tell me so. The last 8-bar solo on What A Day is NOT Secrest.

10 years ago

harryoakley

I hope you will read it again and see that it is highly unlikely that Secrest blares his loud lead, away from the mike, just before the solo and then, within a second, runs to the mike, plays the very soft, restraint and sensitive solo with a very different tone and then, again within a second, steps away from the mike again and starts the loud riff passages, after the first of which he is joined by the second cornet.

10 years ago

harryoakley

I have send an email.

10 years ago

harryoakley

It can only be Bix "noodling" as there was nobody else present who "noodles" like that, while Secrest was busy playing the lead. It's too much to explain here but if you give me your email address by answering this (which, after copying, I will immediately remove again) I will mail you the article in question which leaves no doubt whatsoever about Bix's presence.

10 years ago

harryoakley

Read the whole text above (and preferably also the big article about this topic in the IAJRC Journal) and then try to understand why it cannot be Secrest playing the solo here.

10 years ago

weatherbirdsofprey

this is fascinating. i get the sense it's bix. fits together like his playing always does.

10 years ago

Gordon Hudson

Will do Harry. Than k you for uploading this and bringing it to my attention.

10 years ago

harryoakley

Bix is simply doodling in the background - in a very typical Bix manner.

10 years ago

harryoakley

I am always surprised when people don't recognize Bix because he doesn't follow a certain pattern. As if Bix was predictable! What gives it away is not only the phrasing but also the tone and the embouchure. Besides, it cannot be Secrest because he is also playing at the same time. I lectured in Racine about Bix being on this session - of which I am 100% certain. The lecture was printed in the magazine of the IAJRC. Also listen carefully to the other side (also ion YouTube) and read the text.

10 years ago

Gordon Hudson

PS I just went through my file of Bix transcriptions and he does do some directly descending scales. In At the Jazz Band Ball he does a directly descending group of two triplets in bar 10 starting on an E and then repeats it in bar 38 but starting on the C and going up to D before descending. You will hear the same thing in Royal Garden Blues. Its one of his signatures.

10 years ago

Gordon Hudson

Having had another listen I can concede the possibility of it being Bix at 0:28 and 2:29 in the background. However, the phrase at 0:28 is a straight descending phrase. Bix tended to start on a note below, which I think he got from the way he did a lot of soloing that started on triplets. However, he could have been playing from a written out part (he could read music by this stage). OR he could have been in one of his messed up phases and pulled in to play second.

10 years ago

harryoakley

If you read the text you'll see that it cannot be Secrest either. So who is it then? I clearly recognize Bix in those two brief phrases and in the last solo on the other side of this record: "What A Day". The solo in "Sugar" is completely different and by a different person (personally I think it's Don Murray).

10 years ago

Gordon Hudson

Hmm. I wish it were true, but it does not feel quite like Bix. The tone is brighter than we might expect and its much tighter than Bix of that period. I suppose its a bit like "Sugar", and it will be hard to tell.

11 years ago

oldtimedrumcorps

Sounds like Bix at 1:09 to 1:!9 right after the 8th note intro. Maybe just 2 bars? Very soft and lyrical. The player ever so slightly drags behind the tempo which Bix often does for interest.

11 years ago

harryoakley

The sound is typical Bix. Please read the text which explains where you hear Bix and the reason why it is him.

11 years ago

bhsisthebest

...anyway both sides are beautiful and the Bix follower is genius, too. Thank you for posting!

11 years ago

bhsisthebest

Bix has mellower sound, not as bright as the one on this record. His playing is more gentle.

11 years ago

harryoakley

I beg your pardon?

Related Videos