The Hollies - If I Needed Someone video free download


24,212
Duration: 02:22
Uploaded: 2010/08/06

Subscribe to my new channel!

http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=zeppo2K

Song is property of Sony Music Entertainment. I do not own the picture, music, or anything associated with this video. Sony reserves all rights.

Comments

10 years ago

Ken H.

Just Damned Tremendous!

10 years ago

Olle Sveneriksson

To begin with, the version here might be badly transformed to Youtube, that what it sounds to me. Still it can be a bad production from the beginning. They´ve accepted careless guitar playing and to much noise on the drums. Sounds like a live version actually. Listen to Concert for George with Eric Clapton and everybody, great musicians and great sound!

10 years ago

jerry j

Crappy version of a great song.

11 years ago

Matt Padden

Just to settle all this endless debating, George himself HATED the Hollies version of his song, and they were annoyed with him for going public with his disdain! Personally, the vocals on this are wonderful - but the general playing sounds a bit slapdash and also not very well arranged. I can see why George was a bit upset.

11 years ago

darwindoeseliza

Yes and it was great.

11 years ago

impossiblecolours

did you ever deliver?

11 years ago

19111967CDF

Sounds like Liam Gallagher

11 years ago

sunboy1000

love the Hollies

11 years ago

lulamidgeable

Yes, that's exactly how I feel about it. The vocals are great on this but needs more kick in the instrumentals.

12 years ago

Count Blastula

oh come on it's not THAT bad

12 years ago

Ken H.

I think It Kicks Ass.

12 years ago

circlemaker

Not to Top the original but a very respectful,nice cover....in their own style.

12 years ago

FlingsPooAtTheZoo

Well, George and the lads had set the bar so high with their version...

12 years ago

Tomy

The crazy fact: it was released on the same day as Rubber Soul.. so on the same day as the original song.

12 years ago

Rockinnandout

Graham, he was cocky and not be a very good musician, is another matter, I consider this excellent group, but I never believed in the style of Graham, was ridiculous.

12 years ago

Rockinnandout

hear that from someone very knowledgeable about "the beatles" to John Lennon, loved this cover, because it sounded, more rock, that the version of themselves. and he was right for me, I like this version much like the beatles. The battery is excellent, and has a strong and natural sound.

12 years ago

alcohkid

i totally agree!!! it's a very ugly cover!! and the stupid Graham Nash said they were "quite critical and said they had made a mistake recording it"... yeah you are fucking right sir Graham... you should not have recorded a version and CRY why your single did not reach the top 20 in the UK!!!

12 years ago

greg oropeza

I had to listen a few times, can't believe I've never heard this. Once I got used to this version, I think the vocals are as good as the Beatles version (great harmonies), the rhythm section is great, but the guitar work is pretty weak. The signature lick that Harrison lifted form the Byrds is gone, and the break is a mess around the 1:20 mark.

12 years ago

mervrun

I like the Hollies.....but this is just bad.....

12 years ago

David Bailey

Some fine drumming from Bobby Elliot. Best thing on the record IMO. I love the Hollies but this really does feel as if it were recorded in a hurry and mixed in a rush too. Lots of rough edges.

Related Videos