Pink Floyd - See Emily Play (with lyrics) video free download


222,765
Duration: 02:51
Uploaded: 2012/01/02

This is one of my favourite songs. I do not own this song, the lyrics or Pink Floyd (I wish I did). This video was made for entairtainment purposes only. Enjoy ;)

Comments

8 years ago

Eddi Kett

diesen Link widme ich meiner Enkeltochter Emily (5 Wochen alt)*Pink Floyd* - See Emily Play

8 years ago

Paul Dillon

I wonder if this song had an influence on The Beatles song Lucy in the Sky withDiamonds?

9 years ago

Scott Bradley Copeland

pleasant

9 years ago

Spyder Fweek

I saw My nieces friend Emily playing yesterday in the front yard! 

9 years ago

norcalguy916

good song

9 years ago

Nomadmandolin

Let's try it another way...

9 years ago

Kristine Ohkubo

Dig! :-)

9 years ago

Vladimir Sánchez

I like this song..

9 years ago

Dick C. Normous

My da is 50 not a grey hair on his head , syd and mushrooms baby 

9 years ago

kevin allcock

fantastic track

9 years ago

PON SASA

see~♪emilyplay~♪

11 years ago

Dgraham13

I may get so much hate for this, and I'm sorry if you are offended, but I really like Pink Floyd without Syd Barrett. (please don't hurt me)

11 years ago

Dgraham13

I really don't understand the Pink Floyd that had Syd Barrett. It's kind of creepy.

11 years ago

Funky Duck

I would have wrote that :c

11 years ago

bigswedenman29

it is just me, or does this sound a ton like the beatles

11 years ago

progreadicto

wrong, revolver was recorded in april to june and released in august, freak out was recorded in may, and released in june. even blonde on blonde (better than freak oput and far better than revolver) was recorded in january. what are the "inventions" of revolver: 10 seconds of backwards, a song with violins (not the first), a song with brass (not the first), an indian song (not the first), a 3 minute song with tape loops and yellow submarine, the rest are the same catchy melodies.

11 years ago

Mike Chism

revolver came out before freek out

11 years ago

Mike Chism

the who better then the beatles share some of that joint this way

11 years ago

progreadicto

chronologically the who, the beatles, the stones and the kinks were before PF. i was talking about quality. even i think the who is better than rolling stones or the beatles, the stones was not so diverse and the beatles were rooted in pop tradition, but "the who" tried almost everything, and the most important: they do it well.

11 years ago

Jack Finlayson

While I agree, A lot of people wouldn't. They had a huge following. The who were before the Floyd as well. Floyd is really a Third generation rock band in my opinion. Elvis, Chuck Berry etc. Then the Who, the Stones, the beatles Then Zeppelin and PF

Related Videos