mewithoutYou - "Disaster Tourism" video free download


97,658
Duration: 03:08
Uploaded: 2007/06/28

From the album, "Catch For Us The Foxes," in stores and online now on Tooth & Nail Records.

Comments

9 years ago

Jennie Kole

Woah Aldo would approve of this! !

9 years ago

Timothy John

It was time for everyone to enjoy another excellent mewithoutYou song, another one of their best...mewithoutYou - "Disaster Tourism"

11 years ago

entropicdharma

it would be super cool if we could parse our religious feelings from the core message being conveyed in this song.

11 years ago

Rock Forty

if you are really going to use logical reasoning you would realize there is no victor in an argument. arguments are for progression, for resolving discrepancies. if one wins and one loses, the society stays at equilibrium. give up no one side could ever prove to be right. you have failed to use logic correctly.

11 years ago

Jeremiah Byrne

Ummmmmm... 1st, you use circular reasoning, which is yet another logical fallacy(and I can claim victory once again). 2nd, you contradict your statement in your argument. How can you use a flawed system to prove that same flawed system is, in fact, perfect? That makes no sense! If you see no problem with circular reasoning, then my defense is quite simple: God created the world because the Bible tells me so, and the Bible is true because the Bible says it is. See the problem with circular reason

11 years ago

Gazjohnful

No shit. What else am I going to use? Use god to prove science is right? No, I will use science to prove it is right. Now, let me add... Science has been wrong, alot. Scientists used to think the world was flat. But the thing about science is, when It is proved wrong, it admits it is wrong... that is something religion will never be able to do. But first if you want to dispute the way the world was created, you have to PROVE it was god for anyone to take you seriously... back to the stone age.

11 years ago

Jeremiah Byrne

You used scientific evidences to prove science is right...

11 years ago

Gazjohnful

There is lots of outside evidence that Science is true. One, We know that the universe is not 7000 years old. We know its roughly 13.75 billion years old. We know this due to Radio signals, computer calculations of the universe spreading and even something as simple as light. It is completely illogical and dull to say, god did it. Numerous reasons why. The earth is NOT 7000 years old, as we can carbon date fossils of dinosaurs. There is no evidence inside or out to suggest God is true. Prove it

11 years ago

Jeremiah Byrne

There is no outside evidence that suggests that science is true. You use circular reasoning as well. I was never debating the positive side of God, I was asking for your evidence on the rejection of God. Once again, I can say that I have won the debate as you used an Ad Hominem fallacy, but I'll let it go this time. Please continue.

11 years ago

Gazjohnful

Well the ironic thing is you call Physics misconceptions when it IS backed up with hard evidence. There is NO evidence for god no matter how you try to word it. So you believe something with not one strand of evidence over something with it? You sir, are simply idiotic and I am now done talking with a simpleton who only argument for there being a god is, "I can't prove there is a god from this universe"... You put up the crappiest debate ever.

11 years ago

Jeremiah Byrne

I was not making any arguments, I was merely helping some of your misconceptions. No one can be certain of anything in this universe. To come only from within the universe leads to relativism, so who knows whats true anyway? Coming from outside the universe, God cannot be proven from this universe. Give me all the evidence you want, I can put it all under "Creation" without contradiction.

11 years ago

Gazjohnful

If your beliefs have no relevance here, then explain something... Why are they here? You just contradicted your whole argument. I can explain everything in this universe without the need for there to be a God. The "THEORY" of god is now, pointless. If it makes you a better person, so be it... Keep it to yourself if you can not prove "IT" exists. Like I said, I can explain everything coming into creation without a god, with evidence, you can not do that. Prove me wrong.

11 years ago

Jeremiah Byrne

Yes it is. You were the first to make the statement here. The burden of proof lies on you. If I had said,"God is real," the burden of proof would be on me. But your statement,"God's a tosser..." requires you to back your assertion. I am backing nothing. My beliefs have no relevance here, only yours. Back them up.

11 years ago

Gazjohnful

That is not what the burden of proof is. I claim it isn't real. You claim it is real. You have to prove it.

11 years ago

Jeremiah Byrne

You know what I find funny? The burden of proof is on you, as you made the first statement about His existence. And then you tell me not to push my beliefs on others(which I'm not, I'm discussing), and then you use assertion after assertion. I smell a hypocrite. Looks like I won.

11 years ago

Gazjohnful

"Babes were ripped from their mothers and slaughtered" Yeah, we are talking about 13 year old's for sure... Face it, your imaginary friend is a really shitty one. You can't prove god exists, the burden of proof is with you, as you claim it is true... So stop pushing your beliefs on other people and fuck off.

11 years ago

Jeremiah Byrne

True, it does not directly say that, but as any history teacher will tell you, we cannot reflect our current social standards on the past. Back then, there were no "teens". Once you hit 13(there do exist some abnormalities to this general rule), you were considered an adult.

11 years ago

Jeremiah Byrne

I don't just use the Bible for my facts, as that would be circular reasoning and a logical fallacy. In fact, you are using a logical fallacy right now, so in my mind I have won this argument. Try to hold up to your own standards next time.

11 years ago

Gazjohnful

Oh really because it doesn't mention that anywhere in the bible... Face it... your make believe fairy was a child killer.

11 years ago

Jeremiah Byrne

This is not child sacrifice. By "little ones", it means any make above the age of 13(roughly). By that age in that time, they were not considered children. They were considered full-fledged adults, just "little". Therefore, it is not child sacrifice, due to the definition of "child" being relative to society.

Related Videos