MC Hawking - What We Need More Of Is Science video free download

Piotr Bienkowski

Stephen Hawking rap! :D Starts at 0:48

GastonAsston

They see MC Hawking leave and a they can't tell the other guy in the Wheel Chair that looks just like him called "Dr. Astro" is MC Hawking.Well, so much for logic and reason...

jw870206

+l0new0lfzed Dogma vs. Doctrine. Dogma is permanent, and doctrine is subject to change with time. Just because science has what is considered dogma does not make it a religion. It is a methodology—a means by which one can achieve the same results repeatedly in a lab setting. Thus science and religion are not rivals since they are not of the same existence. It's apples and oranges. My primary and secondary education were Catholic with science (including the Scientific Theory of Evolution and the acceptance that the Universe and Earth are billions of years old) and religion (understanding what Jesus taught and why he sacrificed himself along with what the Catholic Church believes) as part of the curriculum. At no point was there ever a suggestion that accepting science and the many theories with it is contradictory to believing in God and being Catholic (or of any religion).

MrFuzzFuzz

Now adding Ken Lawrence to the list of people that say I shouldn't do science...

Brad Leclerc

It's an MC Hawking (and nerdcore in general) kinda night I think. Yup.

jw870206

Science is not a religion or a belief system. It is a method that establishes facts. Now folks who try to put science alongside religion like they are supposed to be compared are trying to compare apples to oranges. To establish a dogma or a belief system around science would be an utter waste of time, because that is a contradiction. Science isn't about belief. It's about ideas and facts. Beliefs are completely different from ideas and facts.

jw870206

Why go door to door to spread the "good news" about chemistry, physics, thermo, and evolution when you can charge people 10-grand per semester to come to college and learn about that shit? lol

joinmarch76

Oh, so he went for the Clark Kent approach to superheroing? Go figure.

Chris a

And, lastly, if you have any illusions people know how to think naturally, take and give them the Wason Selection Task philosophyexperiments dotcom /wason/ Or google it. A simple, 10-60sec one-question quiz that proves 90%+ of people can't even get basic, intro-level, logic right in a simple question where you simply need to flip over cards. You can't reason without an understanding of logic you can have thoughts of course but... yeah. 90% fail the 1-1=0 level of logic, as proven by Wason.

Chris a

That's not even counting deductive atheology. For example, you can prove there exist no object which is both "Round" and "Square" because they're mutually exclusive properties. I can prove there are no beings which are all-just and all-merciful. You can't disprove the supernatural, but you can disprove instances of it. I.E. Someones concept of a God. Of course, they won't go, "You're right, my beliefs are foolish", they're ignore the problem or edit their god to fix that. But dumb is dumb.

Chris a

You obviously know nothing of logic or science; are a sophist trying to feel special. I mean that dumb, "God of the Gaps" style argument there. There are fewer questions when you find out stuff, not more. Knowing more and asking different questions doesn't mean there's a never ending pursuit. There is a total limit of discoverable knowledge within the universe. Educate yourself. Wikipedia:Logic nibien.blogspot.com/2011/05/dunning-kruger-effect.html nibien.blogspot.com/2011/10/logic.html

ShakmeteMalik

The lyric "the conclusion foregone" is used in relation to the dismissal of belief.based on the (Judeo-Christian) Bible. That is not how science operates. It would be like saying "Einstein's Theory of Relativity is correct because it adequately explains the functioning of the universe" is a foregone conclusion. Without actually doing testing to examine whether something is or is not correct, there can be no conclusions. Nothing can be 'foregone,' except in fundamentalist interpretation.

Chibling

Fundamentals of science: logic, evidence and reason. Fundamentals of religion: faith AKA gullibility.

Suitov

Is it incredibly sad that my first thought on the first glimpse of The Fundamentalist was "hey, they drew him in HeroMachine!"?

Carl Sagan

hardly. dogmatic belief in facts and logic? so whata

Venkatachala Upadhya

wow your right... this track pumps me out Hey peeps are using this to get this song on your ipod: bit.ly/12yNUMp?=hqbif

bryony

bad production

MC Hawking

MC Hawking - Entropy

MC Hawking

MC Hawking - Fuck The Creationists

mc chris

mc chris - Hoodie Ninja