Dirt Poor Robins - Eleanor Rigby video free download


60,663
Duration: 04:17
Uploaded: 2008/04/17

Dirt Poor Robins

"Eleanor Rigby"

From their album "The Cage"

(c) 2007 Astonish Entertainment

Created at animoto.com

Comments

9 years ago

Jaron Davis

Awesome!

9 years ago

seapixie777

Fantastic job! I just started uploading videos last night and I am as "basic" as it gets . lol - lots to learn.Really enjoyed your work on the video. :)

10 years ago

Sarah Landy

I love this version better than the rest.

10 years ago

dndnerd1234

Honestly? A little bit. Especially in saying "They wrote sad music! Obviously cynical!" "Imagine" especially, which is an incredibly hopeful song about a possible perfect world. And of course they wrote some of their songs to make money. Money is nice, and wanting it doesn't make you a cynic, especially not if you're pouring your heart out in other songs. As for the heart and head working together, what about instrumentals? Not a single coherent thought to be found (excepting music theory).

10 years ago

William Straney

I'm not trolling. Whether you're talking about "Yesterday" or "Imagine" or too many of their songs, or McCartney's admission that some of their songs were written only to make money, or even their personal lives, there's simply no question of their being cynical. Also--what does it mean to make an emotion and not a point. The heart and the head always work together. Always. No such thing as love without truth, or truth without love. Do I still sound like a troll? ;l

10 years ago

dndnerd1234

This is an obvious troll from eight months ago, but fuck it. To start, the Beatles were not in the least bit cynical, and they had a huge reputation for being optimistic and cheerful, Elanor Rigby being something of a black sheep song for them. The song itself isn't about commenting on darkness, it's about painting a detailed picture of two people with minimal detail, and it's meant to create emotion, not make a point.

10 years ago

liam jay

look at all those lonely people :(

11 years ago

Grakkov

This is the only cover that they did, and it is VERY original. It sounds refreshingly different than the original.

11 years ago

TheShadedKnight

I don't know, this doesn't give me the same feeling as the Beatles' did. I wouldn't say this is as much a cover as it is an attempt at re-imagining the original, and while I can almost see this as a stand-alone song, it just doesn't hit me with the same amount of depth and emotion the original did.

11 years ago

Cody Sisco

Oh darn, i just noticed only two people commented since me two months ago... :(

11 years ago

jayjaydeth

Hmm... This is pretty good. Still prefer the Beetles version though.

11 years ago

KonceptRhymes

really? hahahaha

11 years ago

Cody Sisco

Love it, heard it on Pandora nad got hooked on the band.

11 years ago

William Straney

I hate the Beatles. Whining, cynical nihilists with cheap musical and philosophical ideas. And this song has always epitomized their worldview for me. "Look at us! We can TOTALLY see the darkness and we've ALMOST got something to say about it!" But this cover, and the way the phrase "No one was saved" is handled, makes this a very good song with a truer view of things. No thanks to the Beatles: they can still go suck it. I give DPR full credit.

11 years ago

kaladamness

The Beatles did tons of covers too?

11 years ago

WorldTrade CenterKid

i hate these people. they cant cover a beatles song. -_- i swear. be original for gods sakes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

11 years ago

MysteriousSteve

sounds like a dubstep version of elinor rigby by the beatles

11 years ago

Kevin Lee

thank you pandora for making me stumble upon to such a feat

11 years ago

TheUnofficialNinja

... It's a cover. And a totally bitchin' one as well, hot damn.

11 years ago

Vladimir Pudding

It's not a copy, it's something called a remake. A lot of musical artists make remakes.

Related Videos