nightwish wacken 2008 - Amaranth скачать видео бесплатно

Amanda Padilha

People say Anette sings badly and that Tarja was better, I disagree. Each one is unique, and the voice of Annette, wow, gave a new tone to Nighywish. Honestly, it will be lovely.

Cassio Maia

Hey, dummy, try reading your coments and mine again. Can you read at all?

IDislikeCowards

Hey dummy, please find any comment I've made that "links" classical music to metal. What I have said is that the original Nightwish blended classical VOCALS with metal based INSTRUMENTALS. I guess you don't understand English that well, so maybe that's part of the problem. Tarja's vocals were powerful, dynamic, and fit the songs perfectly. In fact, the songs were WRITTEN for her voice and her style of singing. It was that combination which made them famous and brought them huge success.

IDislikeCowards

Hey dummy, please find any comment I've made that "links" classical music to metal. What I have said is that the original Nightwish blended classical VOCALS with metal based INSTRUMENTALS. I guess you don't understand English that well, so maybe that's part of the problem. Tarja's vocals were powerful, dynamic, and fit the songs perfectly. In fact, the songs were WRITTEN for her voice and her style of singing. It was that combination which made them famous and brought them huge success.

IDislikeCowards

Uh huh. So how many Justin Beiber CDs do you own, or do you just watch him on YouTube?

Cassio Maia

You got the right to like it or not, but not to say that it's not the real Nightwish or that classical music is more linked to metal than pop. It's a demonstration of ignorance.

Cassio Maia

I'd be okay if they fit my personl taste. I'd not be okay if they don't but I will respect their decisions without wearing the small mind of a ignorant metalhead. All music is comercial, some more, some less, but, as said by Strokes' vocalist: if you creat a song just for your own, why show it to others? You always want recognition and, it professional lines, it means money, no band survives with love just, it won't buy stages and staff. You guys think you know what music is, you know nothing.

IDislikeCowards

I bet you'd be ok with it if they replaced Marco with 50 cent or Justin Beiber. Anything to make it more "commercial" would be good as far as you're concerned. You can be a fan of whatever suck music you like, that's you're right of course.

IDislikeCowards

How pathetic that Tuomas and the boys pushed their own sins unto Tarja and blamed her for their own greed, wanting to sell more albums by changing their music to "more commercially orientated" rather than by trying to create better music. It was Tarja who kept the band from becoming another pop metal rock band like many of the others, those who sound just like the rest. That is why they had to get rid of her and blame her for everything they were about to do wrong.

IDislikeCowards

WTF is a mamber? Is that what Anette is, a mamber? Well at least they didn't make her a member, because that would suck worse. I really don't care about Iron Maiden, it's not that hard to sing the way the guy does, there are more than a few who could sing like that, and do. And yep, you demonstrate that all that matters to you fan boys and girls is "how many albums they sold". I guess you must love Miley Cyrus and Justin Beiber, they've sold WAY more albums than NW ever has.

Cassio Maia

I think other fans, more than with Tarja and more than you are saying that it is okay. Why should you think your opinion is the right one instead of their? :) You got the right to have your own opinion, but not to think that it's the real fact of the center of universe and it's better than other opinions.

Cassio Maia

I said mambers, not singers. Read it twice. It's not you who decide if it worked or not. Fans here can't think with reason without being a mad child I guess. So you mean that Dickinson should never have joint Iron Maiden? Because Iron was bigger than Nightwish when they did it and Angra was bigger than Nightwish when Matos left them and Edu was completely well accepted. It goes against your arguments! haha And you say it did not work with Anette. The albuns are selling even more than with Tarja

IDislikeCowards

Myself, I think gearing the music towards what is "more commercially successful" is a sell out, a choice to make more money rather than to make better music. In fact, it's a matter of greed over substance, the very thing they accused Tarja and her husband of. Ironically, it appears they simply projected their own inner thoughts onto Tarja and blamed her for their own misdeeds. As far as DPP outselling any other album NW has made, I've heard that claim but I've never seen it proven.

IDislikeCowards

As far as Deep Purple, I only owned Machine Head and thought that was a great album. I think at some point I may have picked up the album with "Hush" on it. But whatever. NW without Tarja is like Queen without Freddy Mercury. There is no replacement for either.

IDislikeCowards

Black Sabbath a "cult band"? Maybe if you live in Hicksville, USA, but not in mainstream America on the coasts. Their albums with Ozzy were their best and is what made them famous. They were ok with Dio, but were not the same band. I didn't listen to much Rainbow, I mustly listened to them for the guitar not the vocals. SOME people like pop music more than hard core music with an attitude, so yeah, SOME people liked Van Halen more with Hagar than with Roth. I wasn't one of them.

harry balzac

Taste is subjective really.It's what you can sell .I mean Zeppelin without Plant-Purple without Gilan-Stones without Jaggar-I agree. Not the same.I think tarja was a much better singer than Anette but they have publicly said They couldn't work with her anymore and to replace her with a similar singer would be just a copycat.Their idea was to take the band to a more commercially pop rock sound and it has paid off.Dark passion play has outsold any alblum tarja ever did with them. Kudos.

harry balzac

Taste is all subjective.But Hagar,s alblums sold more than Roth's.Ian Gillan was a replacement.Rod Evans was Purples singer on their first 3 alblums.Grahm Bonnet replaced Dio in Rainbow and was only with them for a year until Blackmore got Joe Lynn Turner who was the most commercially sucessful with that band.Sabbath here in America was a cult band until 1980 when they released Heaven and Hell,Still their best selling alblum.Purple has had 2 other guitarists,Tommy Bolin and Steve Morse.Both gr8.

IDislikeCowards

Er, no. MOST bands do not change singers. SOME do, and sometimes it works out if they were a relatively unknown band and/or the original singer wasn't that good anyways. But a band who reached high levels of success with a particular singer who helped shape the band's sound and image, well, those sorts of people just can't be replaced.

IDislikeCowards

Take away Freddy Mercury from Queen. How many hits have they had since? What if Steve Tyler left Aerosmith? Think nobody would notice? A band which focuses on vocals such as NW can't just replace their singer with some mediocre vocalist, in fact, most times they simply CAN'T replace their singer and remain the same band and keep their distinctive style and sound.

IDislikeCowards

I never liked Van Hager, but Van Halen used to be one of my favorite bands. Deep Purple had a different singer? Never listened to them after Ian Gillian left. Iron Maiden? Was never a huge fan anyways. Rainbow? Wasn't that a band formed by Ritchie Blackmore from Deep Purple? What would have happened if HE left? Sabbath? They were sort of ok without Ozzy when Dio was their vocalist, but they still weren't as good as the original Sabbath.