Perry Como Live - Hot Diggity - 1956 descargar videos gratis

george bolkovac

A hometown Star!!!!

shaun F

wot u do to me /

Drew Beck

Fantastic!

john mcnabb

Brilliant

Carolyn Argabright

His smile, wow!

oldcodyjr

He was always SO laid-back.

Dumbarton Cat

Still Game

Jmymandy

Mickey Mouse theme song

Jean-Jacques Lafortune

Toujours emballé par ce grand chanteur!

Caitlin Heppner

Cracks me up every time!! Love it!

CarlDuke

Perry is great, but as dancers those girls are great back up singers.

sauquoit13456

On this day in 1958 {Feb. 8th} Perry Como performed "Hot Diggity" on his NBC-TV weekly variety show... Two years earlier on March 10th, 1956 it entered Billboard's Hot Top 100 chart; & on May 5th it peaked at #1 {for 1 week} on Billboard's Most Played by DJs chart and spent 23 weeks on the Top 100 The B-side, "Juke Box Baby", also charted, it reached #10 {a rare two-sided Top 10 record} & stayed on the Top 100 for 17 weeks Perry Como passed away on May 12th, 2001 at age 88 May he R.I.P.

mrob75

1/ To southern states it was considered "normal" but not to the northern states...That is history. 2/ Not being "normal" (50s style) in dress/fashion/style) equates to tacky...Plain and simple. 3/ If you are saying that the words: respectful, tasteful, dressy, and elegant can be applied to today's (2012) fashions/trends i.e. overt tattoos, "jeggings", plumber's butt pants, "cholo" wear, multiple piercings, uncombed/unwashed hair etc...That's even more funny!

Adrian Bartholomew

Anyway this discussion has reduced to the irrational as you continue to evade the recognition of your expressed foundation for what it objectively is - that which is accepted by the majority. This has been your only argument and it has not stood up. So you can have the last say in its repetition.

Adrian Bartholomew

1/ Are you saying that there was no period when slave ownership was not considered normal in the US? You should check your history. 2/ Not being 'normal' does not equate to 'terrible'. 3/ "respectful, tasteful, dressy, elegant" - all these words can be interpreted quite differently by different cultures across different times and are quite subjective. Therefore they cannot be used as a standard. And again, it's begging the question. "What's elegant is...well...elegant." That's quite funny.

mrob75

1/ Slavery wasn't NORMALCY in the northern states...Never said slavery was "proper" 2/ True...Today's fashions (tats, piercings, etc) are terrible in comparison to the 1950s! And what a shame people don't dress "normal" aka respectful / tasteful 3/ Taste (in dress) = respectful, tasteful, dressy, elegant 1950s! Just like what you see in this video.

Adrian Bartholomew

Mmm. You misunderstand me. 1/ If you use NORMALCY as your standard, then since there was period of time in your country when slavery was NORMAL, then, according to your logic, it was proper. 2/ 50s fashion/style WAS normal - back in the 50's. It is not when compared to today. 3/ What are you basing your 'taste' on?

Adrian Bartholomew

So you use whatever you can wrap your head around as the standard of 'the good'. Your own sense of taste or whatever is ancient. You completely don't realize that you yourself are in the box. That you preferred the music, language, fashion, gait, etc. of your own generation when you were a young teenager over those of your parents and their ancestors. This phenomenon is not unique to your generation.

Adrian Bartholomew

Proximity to normal is exponential in perception through time. For e.g., showing a 'little too much ankle' would have been frowned upon in yesterday's society while, today, we may not even perceive a difference between the two. You are committing the logical fallacy of 'begging the question'. You claim that yesterday's fashion is good because yesterday's fashion is good. Then you use that as the standard by which you judge today's fashion. Your foundational argument is flawed.

mrob75

50s dress fashion never held anyone to anything resembling servitude...Not sure why you would equate the two...The point you are attempting to make is that you don't consider 50s fashion/style "normal"....But it was in comparison to what is seen today. People's dress/ style/fashion today could never hold a candle to this era and before. It's simply tasteless.

Perry Como Live

Perry Como Live - Because - 1956

Perry Como Live

Perry Como Live - When You Come to the End of the Day