Cherie & Marie Currie - Messin' with the Boys descargar videos gratis

LSweet2007

The sisters look good, but the band looks stupid! 

nonnylurkerliker

You need to get your fucking facts straight. They had no choice but to focus only on Joan and Cherie because Lita and Jackie didn't want anything to do with movie.

rrhone

That's too bad. A really good movie could have resulted but instead we got a half ass effort. Such a shame. Thanks for responding. Rodger

Paul Lvamp

It was based on Cherie's book ''Neon Angel''....so it's gonna be focused on what's in the book...plus Lita's people and Fox's camp said they would sue if they were represented in a bad way...Kim Fowley wasn't even allowed on the set or invited to Sundance for the release....it's good to know the inside scoop. I know what you mean about the disappointment though. Maybe there will be another one made from a different perspective someday.

Lindsay Jones

wasnt her fault they put her in that position

Lindsay Jones

love your icon :)

Lindsay Jones

the story was inaccurate too! and shitty actors~

jonbecker03

i guess sha na na really could be a credible, seventies-style rock band when they wanted to be, instead of being a kitschy throwback to the fifties. (assuming what we are hearing actually IS the sound of sha na na backing up the curie sisters.)

Official Brittany Loveless

The Runaways were a great band. It wasn't hard to realize that they never continued being a band considering the fact that they were all so young and had differences. Cherie Currie, in my opinion, was a selfish attention whore. Great singing voice, but certainly not a genius. She was used to be the "hot blonde" that only sung the songs that she didn't even write. The band would've done more without Currie. The only bandmates worth while were Joan Jett and Lita Ford.

Brittany Scot

Uh, gee, Idk, I've only seen interviews where Lita talked(or refused to) talk about it, and that she did not want them to use her back story.I've also read what Jackie had to say about it, she didn't even want her NAME in the movie,hence why the bassist became "Robin Robins". It was very well known she threatened to sue Joan over it. Try doing some research!(; That tends to help.

rrhone

Its too bad that Joan 'went the other way'.

rrhone

How would you know?

Brittany Scot

Because thats what Lita and Jackie wanted, genius! They wanted nothing to do with the movie, ESPECAILLY "Miss Fox" who threatened to SUE Joan and Floria if her name was even in the frick film! Jackie's a phsyco. It would have focused more on Sandy if she were still around (RIP Sandy♥), but if you would read Cherie's book, compared to the movie, you would see that when Floria Sigismondi wrote the screenplay, she used her "rights" (to the story) the wrong way, and jacked everything up as well.

SweetLittle RockNRoller

Sandy West... Oh, wild thing is way too COOL for the movie anyway. RIP sandy i <3 u :)))

SweetLittle RockNRoller

Well, the taller one is Marie. So which one WOULD be cherie? LOL

SweetLittle RockNRoller

Well, i guess lita was a real bitch. So they didnt wanna do the whole part, where she gets mad at her alot, and hits her and holds her on the wall. They just wanted people to know the main points of the lead singer, and the backup. And how amazing they were togather :)

SweetLittle RockNRoller

Lol. I think cherie was the one on the right at the end. She was a bit more wild, like she was during the runaways. But... I may be wrong. :)

Holdenon3

The Curies on "Sha Na Na"! Now THAT'S some '70s television memories!!!

Kerbalf

What he said^

Wakuwaks

they are many other reasons...

Joan Jett and Cherie Currie

Joan Jett and Cherie Currie - Cherry Bomb Live 2001

THE RUNAWAYS

THE RUNAWAYS - Wasted (1977 UK TV Appearance) ~ HIGH QUALITY HQ ~

Since You've Been Gone

Since You've Been Gone - Cherie and Marie Currie